Appeals before the Court of Arbitration for Sport

-
Practitioners often receive instructions from clients who wish to appeal before the Court of Arbitration for Sport. In the majority of these cases, clients are motivated by a sense of injustice, which is usually well-justified. A practitioner, obviously, needs to remain independent of sentimental considerations and keep an open mind at all times. An Appeal before the Court of Arbitration for Sport could be an expensive process and one that will cause additional stress and anxiety to the client. Above all, it is an Appeal that very much depends on very specific procedural considerations.

Such procedural considerations should usually form the first and primary course of action for any adviser. The client may feel that he or she has a good case and the adviser may feel confident that he or she could be successful. It is important, however, that the adviser ensures that the dispute in question could be heard by CAS. It is not uncommon for CAS to dismiss an appeal for lack of jurisdiction or because the Appellant was 'manifestly' late in submitting the Appeal. 

Advisers, therefore, must ensure that the Appeal is filed within the 21-day time limit provided for by the procedural rules of CAS. Most importantly, they must ensure that CAS has jurisdiction to hear the Appeal. Such jurisdiction usually derives from the regulatory framework of the sporting governing body in question. A specific clause would normally indicate a route to Appeal, although close attention must be paid to the actual wording of the relevant provision. This is an important point that requires further analysis.

Rules of national governing bodies are usually in line with the rules of international governing bodies, or have been drafted in the same spirit. It may be the case that certain provisions require members to recognise the jurisdiction of CAS, regarding disputes of national dimension. However, the purpose of these provisions may not be to compel CAS to admit in all types of disputes that the national governing body has jurisdiction to hear. In this instance, confusion may be created by the provision which specifically 'recognises' the jurisdiction of CAS. Although such provision may 'recognise' the jurisdiction of CAS, this does not mean that the provision also 'grants' such jurisdiction to CAS. In other words, CAS jurisdiction will be operative only when such jurisdiction is specifically granted by the provisions of the national governing body. This was evident in four football Appeals I was involved in before CAS, in the last three years.

It follows that advisers need to ensure that a specific arbitration agreement is in place, which grants jurisdiction to CAS. Without it and in the absence of another agreement between the parties, it is highly likely that CAS would dismiss the Appeal for lack of jurisdiction. In addition, the 21-time limit for submitting the Appeal must be observed.

These are the primary procedural considerations for those advising clients in relation to Appeals before CAS.

Dr Gregory Ioannidis
26 March 2013




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Preliminary (Provisional) & Conservatory Measures before the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS): Procedure & Practice.

-
Image
  An important aspect of procedure and practice before the CAS, relates to the ability of applicants to seek urgent protective measures, in the form of an application for a Stay of execution of the appealed decision. The legal basis for such application can be identified in Article 183 of Swiss Private International Law and R37 of the CAS Code. The latter, provides that the CAS may, upon request of a party, order preliminary or protective measures. According to CAS practice and jurisprudence (See  CAS 2003/O/486; CAS 2013/A/3324; CAS 2013/A/3199; CAS 2010/A/2071. CAS 2001/A/329; CAS 2001/A/324 ), there is a three-stage test that needs to be satisfied for a successful application on such protective measures (provided that the issue of jurisdiction has been settled): The requested measures must be necessary to protect the Applicant from irreparable harm; There must be a likelihood of success on the merits of the claim; The interests of the Applicant in the ...
Read more

An Insight into the World of Football Transfers

-
Image
This is an interesting, unique and controversial area of modern sport that deserves further examination. Football transfers are, of course, not a new phenomenon. A series of important developments, however, such as the modern and increased commercialisation of sport, as well as the implications and consequences of the decision in the Bosman case, have created a complex framework of individuals, regulations and financial opportunities that determine the present situation. 
Read more

A Civil Action: Recipe for Disaster?

-
The developments in Scottish football, this year, have been astonishing and rather controversial. For the sports lawyer, this is a remarkable opportunity to examine and critically analyse further the perennial battle between state regulation and self-regulation. Rangers have certainly given us this opportunity with their decision to challenge the transfer embargo imposed on them, by submitting an application to a civil court in Scotland. Irrespective of the Scottish court's decision, the question remains whether the football authorities in Scotland would impose further sanctions on Rangers as a result of this development.
Read more